Lost Wedding Rings
Question:
Recently my wife and I attended a rock festival and in the midst of all our fun she lost her wedding ring. I couldn’t possibly afford to replace it with one similar to the original. However I don’t think it really matters. There is a lot more to getting married than a ring. It does not actually bother me that it has gone I was not angry, I didn’t really care. LOVE, its more imprtant than rings. Before you buy.
Response:
> Recently my wife and I attended a rock festival and in the midst of all > our fun she lost her wedding ring. I couldn’t possibly afford to replace > it with one similar to the original. However I don’t think it really > matters. There is a lot more to getting married than a ring. It does > not actually bother me that it has gone I was not angry, I didn’t really > care. LOVE, its more imprtant than rings.
Sorry to hear that. It’s a wonderful outlook to take, and consider this: You have the perfect anniversary present idea – some time in the future!
— Joe Pucillo http://www.JoePucillo.com Baltimore, Maryland USA To reply by email, please remove the .xx from the address.
Response:
>Recently my wife and I attended a rock festival and in the midst of all >our fun she lost her wedding ring. I couldn’t possibly afford to replace >it with one similar to the original.
Sad, but wiser. And thus the importance of insuring valuable items. Noe
Response:
wasn’t it insured? most homeowners policies cover wedding rings. if not, everyone else getting married should look into this! your jewler has to send your insurance company the details of the ring (carat, cut, etc), but it is worth it. i would be devistated if i lost my ring, but i would feel worse if i knew that it would never be replaced!
Response:
> wasn’t it insured? most homeowners policies cover wedding rings. if not, > everyone else getting married should look into this! your jewler has to send > your insurance company the details of the ring (carat, cut, etc), but it is > worth it. i would be devistated if i lost my ring, but i would feel worse if i > knew that it would never be replaced!
The base coverage for our homeowners policy, which I understand to be fairly standard, will only pay $1000 per item, $2500 total for jewelry. After we got married, we had to itemize several pieces of Cathy’s jewelry (including her engagement/wedding set) and my wedding ring in order to get proper coverage. Please, everyone, get your rings insured! Here in Minnesota, there was a story in the news a week or so ago about a bride-to-be that lost her ring down an ice-fishing hole. You never know WHAT might happen to your ring! -Tim Before you buy.
Response:
Insurance is really not that much as long as it is atttached to your home owner policy. I have My FW engagment ring insured and it is about 1% of the value of the ring a year. This includes coverage if she just loses the ring Steve * Sent from RemarQ http://www.remarq.com The Internet’s Discussion Network * The fastest and easiest way to search and participate in Usenet – Free!
Response:
>Please, everyone, get your rings insured!
Why should Rechelle bother? She has a fake ring. No sense in bothering with insurance for THAT. Ron Ng Knows!
Response:
> Insurance is really not that much as long as it is atttached to > your home owner policy. I have My FW engagment ring insured and > it is about 1% of the value of the ring a year. This includes > coverage if she just loses the ring
AND, if it’s like my policy, there’s no deductible for jewelry itemized on the policy. A nice touch if you have a high deductible, like I do. -Tim Before you buy.
Response:
Filed under: Engagement Wedding Ring
Leave a Comment
XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
TrackBack URL | RSS feed for comments on this post.